Here's an interesting news item: "Red Hat’s Secret Patent Deal and the Fate of JBoss Developers".

Here's an ancient -- but still relevant -- piece from Tim O'Reilly: "Software and Business Method Patents".

Here's a great article in Slate on the consequences of software patents. "Weapons of Business Destruction: How a tiny little 'patent troll' got BlackBerry in a headlock".

The biggest issue with software patents is always the "non-obvious" issue. Generally, this can be debated, so a prior art review is far more valuable.

See "Peer Review Starts for Software Patent Applications: IEEE Spectrum talks to the founder to Peer-to-Patent Beth Noveck". This is where the rubber hits the road.

To participate, see Peer To Patent. Locate prior art and make patent trolls get real jobs.

Also, see this: "A patent improvement: Intellectual property: A new scheme will solicit comments via the internet to improve the vetting of patent applications".


Just like we don't want patents to restrict so...

Robert Lucente<noreply@blogger.com>

2010-11-19 19:27:32.178000-05:00

Just like we don't want patents to restrict software development, we don't want companies to restrict the flow of info on the internet. Check out the article by Tim Berners-Lee in Scientific American titled "Long Live the Web" http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=long-live-the-web

Justices to Hear Microsoft Patent Case

Robert Lucente<noreply@blogger.com>

2010-11-30 21:24:24.731000-05:00

Justices to Hear Microsoft Patent Case By REUTERS Published: November 29, 2010 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/30/technology/30bizcourt.html?ref=technology