Here's an interesting news item: "Red Hat’s Secret Patent Deal and the Fate of JBoss Developers".
Here's an ancient -- but still relevant -- piece from Tim O'Reilly: "Software and Business Method Patents".
Here's a great article in Slate on the consequences of software patents. "Weapons of Business Destruction: How a tiny little 'patent troll' got BlackBerry in a headlock".
The biggest issue with software patents is always the "non-obvious" issue. Generally, this can be debated, so a prior art review is far more valuable.
See "Peer Review Starts for Software Patent Applications: IEEE Spectrum talks to the founder to Peer-to-Patent Beth Noveck". This is where the rubber hits the road.
To participate, see Peer To Patent. Locate prior art and make patent trolls get real jobs.
Also, see this: "A patent improvement: Intellectual property: A new scheme will solicit comments via the internet to improve the vetting of patent applications".
Just like we don't want patents to restrict so...
Robert Lucente<noreply@blogger.com>
2010-11-19 19:27:32.178000-05:00
Just like we don't want patents to restrict software development, we don't want companies to restrict the flow of info on the internet. Check out the article by Tim Berners-Lee in Scientific American titled "Long Live the Web" http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=long-live-the-web
Justices to Hear Microsoft Patent Case
Robert Lucente<noreply@blogger.com>
2010-11-30 21:24:24.731000-05:00
Justices to Hear Microsoft Patent Case By REUTERS Published: November 29, 2010 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/30/technology/30bizcourt.html?ref=technology