Binstock does a quick compare and contrast between Ruby and NetRexx, showing how an active community promoted Ruby, and NetRexx's lack of a community left it languishing. I think that this analysis is only partly true, and misses part of the value of open source.

Specifically, IBM's proprietary NetRexx can't …

Here's the scenario I see:

1. The customer bought something, and then customized it. The customization -- by definition -- must have had significant strategic value.
2. The customer set it aside, making no more changes of any kind. Okay, there were bug fixes, but nothing significant. The developers were re-assigned to something new …

Here's a novel point of view on open source software.

'In fact, one of the things Google likes about open source software is that it facilitates secrecy. "If we had to go and buy software licenses, or code licenses, based on seats, people would absolutely know what the Google infrastructure …

Since most of these new-fangled dynamic languages are open-source, we have a a strange artificial barrier to considering the right solution for our problems. This barrier is "No Open Source" policy, usually framed as We'll Use Open Source Over My Dead Body™. It has to be examined carefully from several …

Why does IT have such a high turnover?

• Technology appeal?
• Money?
• Boredom?

No. None of those. We can look at Maslow, but it's too high-level.

• Self-Actualization?
• Self-Esteem?
• Belonging?
• Safety and Security?
• Physical Needs?

Most IT jobs pay pretty well, above the median income. Look at MCP Magazine or InformationWeek , for …

What is the reward structure for open source?

If a corporate IT team builds software using open source components, CP insists, they've made a fundamental blunder. I forget CP's litany of concerns, but he worries that the software is unproven, untrustworthy, risky, etc., etc.

My argument that "you have the …